I'm still aesthetically appreciating this Emy-made fast food.
Life is complex, contingent and encompassing. This blog x-rays issues and proffer solutions to them.
Thursday, 21 January 2016
Sunday, 3 January 2016
THE INTER-SUBJECTIVITY OF THE CONCEPT OF BEAUTY
1.0.PREAMBLE:
The concept of beauty has constituted one of the principal
disturbing issues in the history of Aesthetics. And because there has never
been a consensus on the definition of the term, the concept of ‘beauty’ has consequently
generated controversies among thinkers. For instance, Pythagoras argued that
numbers, proportion and patterns constitute beauty.[1]
Plato’s Formism ended up in
metaphysical objectivism. For him, ‘Beauty’ resides in the world of Forms, and
what we conceive as beautiful are only copies
of the ideal Beauty. Moreover, according to Aristotle, beauty is nothing
but goodness. Besides, David Hume maintained that beauty lies in our individual
perception. As a result of these, it is worthy to note that the peculiar
quality called ‘beautiful’ is not the same at all times and for all persons. Nevertheless,
the fundamental questions remain: What is beauty? What is the nature of beauty?
How can we identify someone who is beautiful? In other words, what makes
somebody or a work of art beautiful? Is beauty objective or subjective? If I
say that beauty lies in how I conceive of it, from where then did I know that it
is beautiful? If I say that beauty is objective, how then do I explain the
diversity in the conception of beauty? Following from the above, a
philosophical investigation into the concept of beauty will solely occupy the
interest of this work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)